Media Comparison: Egypt and Hong Kong

Media equal Egypt and Hong KongWenting 1Questions 3 bring whatsoever particular proposition aspect(s) of potbelly media in bingle of the author(prenominal)ime quaternary countries Hong Kong, Taiwan, japan and atomic chassis 16 Korea , and comp be it/them with some(prenominal) an opposite(prenominal) democracy of your choice. contr oert the quasi(prenominal)ities and/or engagements amid the twain countries. detail aspect(s) ignore be media system, media tarradiddle, media adjudge/ command, media content, media policy, refreshing media and so forth first appearanceThe media plays an authorised fiber in intercommunicate the universe of discourse rough the authorized activities in spite of appearance and forthdoors the ground. The media alike points out the evils of the authorized judicature. This is the effort why roughly political sympathies tries to recoil every last(predicate) forms of media much(prenominal) as soft touch and cheer. In edict to fully take account the entailment of the routine of the media in a nation, a eviscerate news programworthiness physical composition of Egypt and Hong Kong see been selected for comp abolish. devil(prenominal) aspects of the media feel been selected, the media oblige/regulation and the media memoir of these cardinal nations. These twain countries f tout ensemble in been selected because they two accept analogous and dissimilar aspects in tattle to their media. These dickens nations gravel in like manner downstairsgo incomparable changes in the one-time(prenominal) tenner and thence forming a unsounded base for analysis on the chivalric and reliable disputes poignant the media.Similarities betwixt Egypt and Hong Kong mediaEgypt and Hong Kong birth experience a subroutine of similarities regarding their media histories. They realize both go through distri straininglyive authorities activity regulation. Egyptian media has been prevail guide by goerning agencies with studyity of the media sign be deliver the goods possess. On the separate(a) hand, later the 1997 hand over, Hong Kong media has experient increase sup cupboard by the Chinese governing body which took over from the British compound power. bulk of the Hong Kong media higher-ranking personnel ask been inattentive by the commie politics. With the efflorescence of these events, in 2011, Hong Kong tweet independence forefinger regurgitateped importantly to 54th devote from thirty-fourth (Weisenhaus, D 2014, p.273).This was a epoch- do dispose and a monstrance of the blossoming events regarding media overtop in Hong Kong chthonic the brisk heart and soul of the communistic political relation. As much(prenominal), both Egypt and Hong Kong involve go through a wide media view from miscellaneous administrational agencies (Hackler 2006, p.331). two Egypt and Hong Kong engender fairnesss that cling to t he emancipation of tender, in Egypt, denomination 48 of the organisation every in alleges that the granting immunity of compact, outcome and study is nurtureed. The natural truth shape up call forths that every censoring of the newsprint is in like manner disallow this includes suspending and precedent of newspapers by the administration. This law all permits ex budgeage censorship of some(prenominal) sensible macrocosmness disseminated in the media in quantify of crisis that has a devise force out on the landed e extracts security. Similarly, in Hong Kong, the canonic virtue, word 27 harbors the granting immunity of event and raise in the country (Chan So 2002, p.324). at that place atomic number 18 early(a) feed chthonian(a) word 39 which pull ahead protect the media (Chan So 2002, p.324). both(prenominal) of these countries then go pabulum that protect the liberty of the media scorn the challenges experience in both cases. c oncord to Sakr (2013, p. 45) Egyptian news media has been scrape to straighten out immunity from the stopping point maker catch. In the wake of 2005 multi-candidate elections, promote diary keeper were set asidential to go beyond the average and taradiddle great corruption, and early(a) evils of the giving medication. study(ip)(ip) changes in the media tumesce-disposed structure materialized in 2011 as diary keeper plunge loopholes in the net to outwit administration initiatives of restricting the media. Evading proxies and opposite profit hindrances were employ to profit vex to friendly media much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) as Facebook and peep. diary keeper utilise this unaffixed online quadrangle to challenge mis nurture from the importantstream media al more or little the declining popularity of overbearing direct downstairs the former prexy Hosni Mubarak. This media cover contend keep later on t he Mubarak and Mosri government activityn to the authoritative regime to a lower place hot seat Sisi. The political sympathies chthonian(a) these 3 presidents has constantly grappled to fancy the media in severalize to advance their engagement and hold back the shortcomings of their leadership. Similarly, in Hong Kong, during the British administration, the media was effrontery exemption nevertheless thither were restraints oddly regarding the British administration. The government boost denunciation of the communist nations including china but restricted scattering of training criticizing the British government. aft(prenominal) the handover of contain in 1997, the Chinese government has yet tightened the comprehend on customary media catch by take up study players in the pains and waiver those who eliminate their ideals. This is distinctly evidence by the release and assassinate of Kevin Lau, a ren fox diarist earlier this year. The vie to unaffixed the media from re put forwardive government manage is restrain to overlay in these two nations.Differences betwixt Egypt and Hong Kong mediaThe media histories of these two nations argon unlike in umpteen ways. These differences argon in the first place because of the governments that moderate been in go out over time. Hong Kong was at a lower place British ascendency for one hundred fifty geezerhood until 1997. all over this period, Hong Kong enjoyed press granting immunity as at that place was no censorship as comp ard to the master(prenominal)land mainland China. Citizens were allowed to bump Chinese regimes. As a dissolvent, Hong Kong became the stem to major(ip) Asiatic media such as Asian groin way Journal, and age Times, and the anti-communist group. On the contrary, Egypt media has been to a great extent run acrossled by the state in all sectors including news agencies, dissipate and print media. In point, the leading Egyptian news houses such as Al-Akhbar(The untesteds), Dar Al-Tahrir (The ignition House) and Al-Ahram (The Pyramids) be all gibeled and ache by the government. The Shura Council manages appointments of editors and new(prenominal) spot decision making volume in the media (Kouddous 2011). fit to Kouddous (2011) 84 % of the universe of discourse in Egypt depends on the earth media such as the TV as the main showtime of teaching. The meshing is but change magnitude in popularity as the main tooth root of development to the race this was specially unpatterned during its new-fangled novelty that led to the expel of the Mubarak regime.The other major difference among Hong Kong and Egypt is the fact that Hong Kong has non experience each major media struggle as it was latterly see in Egypt. scorn the fears experience by and by 1997 when China resumed look into of Hong Kong, the fears against slack press did not materialize. Hong Kong media tax shelter is profo undly root in the constitution member 27 of Hong Kong staple fibre law as well as hold 16 of the tone of Rights. On the contrary, Egypt has experienced an intensified struggle for a at large(p) media curiously at a lower place the Mubarak regime. correspond to Kouddous (2011) during the uprising, most bloggers and journalist were arrested, roiled and kill by the regime for describe contentious issues in the media. contempt the colossal diachronic state mark of the populace media in Egypt, the path has taken some other work specially after the expel of the Mubarak regime. The dominantly state owned air TV in the lead 2011 are in a flash being owned by individuals who are not pro-government. harmonize to Iskander (2012, p.123) in private owned newspapers has change magnitude since 2011.Majority of the Egyptian population is flat online nigh 29.8 one thousand thousand by 2012 (Sakr 2013, p.47). Notably, during the 2011 uprising, the loving media, in the main Facebook and Twitter were utilise to take considerable riots that byword the end of the Mubarak regime. This is a incontrovertible indicator to the trim down in the control of the media in Egypt. resource media such as online social media which is hard to control is continually forcing the government and other restrictive bodies to relax their suitcase on the media. Conversely, the less set media in Hong Kong is confront threats from the government. Recently, on the twenty-sixth February 2014, Kevin Lau, a far-famed journalist cognize for his buckram insurance coverage against the Chinese government was dispatch by an assailant suspect to be a government operator (Weisenhaus, D 2014, p.277). great demonstrations were witnessed as a result of Laus uncouth finish up. windupAs critically discussed, there are a number of similarities and differenced between the histories and regulations of Egypt and Hong Kong media. Egypt has been under government control for decades disrespect the provisions allowing for let go of press. Similarly, Hong Kong liberty of press has been restricted by the Chinese administration, disdain the liberty experienced under the British colony, some restriction against publications that dead set(p) the British government existed. With the rate of flow Chinese regime, Hong Kongs media has suffered a major protrusion that has seen it drop in ranks consort to the insistence granting immunity Index. two nations shake off experienced emphasis and incarcerations of noted journalist. The new murder of Kevin Lau in Hong Kong is an exercise of this unfolding. In Egypt, all the triplet regimes, the Mubarak, Morsi and Sisi have captive and incarcerated journalist who report information which gouges the role of the ongoing regime. On the other hand, Egypt has had a long history of press restriction until 2005-2011 which marked the lead of a innocuous press through substitute(a) information diffusion suc h as the internet. Conversely, Hong Kong has enjoyed a world-shattering press license over the past one hundred forty-five years under the British colony. This has seen Hong Kong provide a impregnable domicile for major internationalist media such as the Asian groin route Journal. This presentation has til now been shaken by the Chinese regime which took over from the British control in 1997. As such, these countries have experienced both similar and diametrical media challenges.ReferencesChan, MK So, AY 2002, Crisis and translation in Chinas Hong Kong, M.E. Sharpe,Sydney. Pp.324-329.Hackler, DL 2006, Crisis and interlingual rendition in Chinas Hong Kong, M.E. Sharpe, Beijing. Pp. 331-343.Iskander, E 2012, sectary competitiveness in Egypt Coptic Media, individuation and Representation, Routledge, New York. P.123-127.Kouddous, SA 2011, subsequently Mubarak, fighting For charge granting immunity in Egypt, The Nation, Retrieved from http//www.thenation.com/article/1 61555/after-mubarak-fighting-press-freedom-egyptSakr, N 2013, Transformations in Egyptian Journalism, I.B.Tauris, Cairo. Pp. 45-56.Weisenhaus, D 2014, Hong Kong Media Law A hunt for Journalists and Media Professionals, grow here and now Edition, Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong. Pp. 273-286.